Keeping it Real…

Keeping it Real… header image 2

Debate #1: I Told You So …

October 2nd, 2008 · 3 Comments

First let me differentiate between the actual reporting and the editorial commentaries that followed Federal Election Debate #1 en francais .. because I found them quite different.

The basic reporting I heard on the radio, saw on television and read in most on-line and printed news reports was quite fairly done, in my view.  Canadian political reporters are, for the most part, good reporters …  accurate, competent and try very hard to truly reflect what actually happened at an event.

However, my criticism of what I believe to be a growing right-wing editorial slant in the mass media was reinforced today, hours after the French debate.

I hadn’t even had my first cup of coffee this morning, when at 7:42 a.m., I heard Philip Till on CKNW,  in conversation with Global Television’s Ottawa reporter Hannah Thibedeau (sic).  I found Thibedeau’s synopsis of Gilles Duceppe’s fine performance and Stephan Dion’s improved presentation (in his own language, of course) to be perfectly accurate.

But Till, a former full-time reporter …  now morning program host for Corus Radio’s top Vancouver radio station … nicely fulfilled my pre-debate media predictions here Wednesday.

Only Harper came across as a “statesman”, proferred Till.  I predicted the mass media editorialists/commentators would say Harper would emerge as a “leader”.  (See paragraph 5 in my piece below).

And, Till added, Harper seemed as “comfortable” in French.  (My exact predicted word in paragraph 5 .. LOL).

Clearly, in my opinion, words and offerings that would lead listeners to a more sympathetic view of Harper than any of the other candidates.

The coverage in The Province was a disgrace: a weak shallow piece under the headline ”Leaders forced to act polite”.   (Even the headline writer apparently could find nothing in it more substantial!)

Amazingly,  Liberal Leader Stephan Dion’s ideas or proposals for Canada were not quoted at all .. nada … nilo .. gournisht .. even though he came up with the only new announcement during the whole debate: a five point economic plan that would pull together Canada’s economic, business and political leaders within 30 days of being elected.  

But it was Barbara Yaffe’s piece …  and its placement … in The Vancouver Sun I personally found most interesting ..and most disappointing.

“Under Attack, Harper keeps his cool” shouted the Sun’s Front Page headline .. again, I believe,  reinforcing the “comfortable theme” ..and even his portrayal as a ”leader”.

Further, the rest of the article and its placement I think was most significant!

Almost all of the SIX paragraphs that appeared on the front page under the large headline dealt with Harper … Liberal Leader Stephan Dion and  NDP Leader Jack Layton  weren’t even mentioned;   Green Party Elizabeth May was quoted as thinking Harper is “autocratic” … but also “a good father” whose kids are “lovely”. 

And, on the front page, there was this about Harper:  “But he succeeded in never losing his cool and addressed the other leaders on a first-name basis, consistently appearing more statesmanlike (AHA!!!! .. that’s me reacting  :)  than combative. The Conservative leader returned time and time again to his party’s campaign theme — that Conservatives are best able to manage the Canadian economy during economically troubled times. He pointed out repeatedly that his government has acted judiciously, balancing the federal budget and reducing the GST, personal income and business taxes.”

Free front page advertising for the Tories, in my view. 

Almost any media analyst will tell you Front Page is where it’s at!!! That’s what people read, and often re-read while standing at the bus stop, in line at the supermarket, or on theirs and others’ desks at home and/or at the office.

And if you wanted coverage of Dion or Layton, even poltical junkies who followed to Page 4 for the rest of the story, would continue to have been disappointed.

Because on Page 4, as the The Sun article continued, there was yet another mention of Harper reminding Quebec voters it was his government that passed a Commons motion recognizing Quebec as a nation and giving the province a voice at UNESCO.

But you didn’t get to Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe until paragraph 8 on Page 4′s continued article .. that’s 14 paragraphs into the story, and Dion until paragraph 13 (how appropriate!) .. 19 paragraphs into the story and only three paragraphs from the bottom of the article .. AND with only this mention: “ Stephan Dion, whose Liberal party has been doing poorly in polls, performed ably but did not score any dibilitating hits on Harper.”

Not a mention of Dion’s new economic proposal here either nor any other proposal, idea or criticism of Harper put forward by the Liberal leader on any topic.

And the NDP’s Layton fared even worse: not a thing he said, advocated or proposed was quoted at all in the article.

Overall even more one-sided pro-Conservative coverage than even I had predicted.

       

  

Tags: Media · National

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 D. Olson // Oct 2, 2008 at 7:52 pm

    So if they have their reviews written before the show, how can we expect voters to act anything but ‘sheepish’ when the poll doors open?
    One can’t be too surprised at the ‘NW slant, their listeners are pretty deep into the koolaid (well, different koolaid than mine!), and the Province doesn’t need to hide its tab nature. That the Sun editorial board can be so blatant seems to be the big shock (but as you say not completely unexpected).
    Where are the gate keepers, the idea that the press is to ‘comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable’ (not to intimate that Dion is the afflicted, but being that journalism had developed into a healthy ‘holding government accountable’ dictum, why has that disappeared? Harper is running on nothing as far as federal policy is concerned)… I wonder if there isn’t too many ‘comfortable’ people running the show now, who perceive that the issues of the day evolve around tax cuts, traffic to the north shore, and how to get rid of those dirty homeless people should be everyone’s concerns.
    I’m sure you’ve got great insight on this.

    (Response: I don’t think it’s a case of their reactions being pre-written … it’s more a case …as I’ve written about before on Aug 26 Media Conspiracy:Myth or Reality (check the archives Aug 28) that I believe the major private media mostly hire those who support their political points of view .. so they ..and we…get pretty predictable stuff on any topic. ho)

  • 2 Source // Oct 3, 2008 at 3:22 am

    HOHOHO;

    I read this posting and then read the papers this morning and thought…Harvey, NAILED IT!

    Having just watched the English debate I thought that there is actually some hope for this country with the thoughtful, intelligent passion that the leaders (whether I agree or disagree) showed. But the popular misconception, promoted relentlessly by the media, is that this is boring stuff indeed. Which strikes me as being quite disrespectful to the people who dedicate themselves to this country.

    The scrums afterward are on now and I’m actually quite shocked at the partisan nature of the questions (and my partner wonders why we have a translator with an Aussie accent).

    In my opinion, the media continues to fail on every level. In response to D. Olson, it now seems that the role of media is to comfort the comfortable and afflict the afflicted.

    I liked the format of the debate…and I think the only solution for the left in this country is for Green Democrats. And I believe that Canadians know their media is failing them but don’t know what to do about it. How do we as citizens enforce the Broadcast Act? How do we make the CRTC accountable?

  • 3 Grant g // Oct 4, 2008 at 6:13 pm

    I disagree completely, have you watched the CBC(all liberal all the time)
    Canwest global all liberal

    CKNW–Good–Clark –all liberal all the time

    Here is a little something I picked up watching the french debates(something none of you deaf dumb and blind media could spot)
    Harpers translator in the french debate fumbled,mumbled,stuttered and came accross like a mental defective!

    Dion`s translator was fluid,smooth,translated with flare
    Re-watch the french debate if you doubt my observation!
    Last point–How many times has CPAC played the Danny Williams ABC campaign on national broadcast? Over a dozen times–Cadman–plagerize–scary agenda–

    I guess if your another deaf,dumb and blind media member—You should stay retired!

    (Response: It’s kind of funny …but so predictable. In my 38 years as a reporter, I was always amazed at how, even when I wrote things critical of leaders on the left, their pronouncements etc .. their supporters and defenders would always almost happily discuss and debate what I wrote without making immature silly remarks. BUT when someone is critical of a politician or policy on the right..the right wingers SO OFTEN (but thankfully not always) respond with silly remarks like your last line. Just listen to the radio talk shows and you’ll soon hear what I mean. LOL. ho)

Leave a Comment

CAPTCHA Code is needed.

If you do not enter the CAPTCHA code then your comment will be deleted when you select Submit.

*