Keeping it Real…

Keeping it Real… header image 2

Global Union Grieves McCardell Deal

May 27th, 2009 · 7 Comments

This is a story about Mike McCardell that really is not a story about Mike McCardell.

There are few British Columbia television viewers who haven’t seen his reports, about people and places in the Lower Mainland,  rounding out the tail-end of  CanWest Global’s Newshour five times a week. 

People love his human interest stories … or hate them … but they are popular enough to hold many Newshour viewers to the end of the show, instead of dropping off  after the weather or into the sports segment.

For Mike, it has been a great gig … and he is truly adept at what may look like a simple task … talking to people and making what they say appeal to a mass market television audience … but it takes skilfull reporting, writing and editing.

But a problem arose for Mike and Global a few months ago. Mike turned 65: retirement age at Global. 

Uh-oh! What to do? Just let him keep working ….   something that could be cited by other staff, less talented or less popular with management, but who might also want to stay on beyond “normal” retirement age?   Apparently that’s not Global policy.

But Mike wanted to keep working and the company wanted him to keep working. 

 The solution?  Mike officially went into retirement a few months ago, and took a bit of a break (perhaps long enough to start collecting his Canada Pension?  :)     And then apparently Global “rehired” him ….  not as a regular full time employee, but under a special contract.

“I have a fine contract with a good company that has a strong union with a job that I love and I am able to keep doing it,”  Mike explained me in an e-mail Tuesday.

Ahhh yes, the Union.   Strong union. 

Well, it turns out Mike’s new deal worries Mike’s union.

The fear is that Brother McCardell’s special contract with the company could be “thin edge of the wedge” … that could allow the company to hire reporters under a separate arrangement or contract, at whatever wage or per story rate is negotiated … possibly ignoring union wage scales,  hours of work, overtime and  other provisions/responsibilities under the signed union agreement with Global ….  and even without company-paid  health benefits.

Whoa!  What kind of a union shop is that!

So earlier this month, the Newshour’s CanWest Global union, CEP Local 841-M grieved the new McCardell  arrangement …. because  it fears a precedent  that could prove suicidal for the union in the future if it doesn’t stop such hiring arrangements for reporters.

CEP 814-M President Mark Cameron declined to publicly comment on the specific grievance over McCardell, noting it has not yet been discussed with the company.  But he added ” the first goal of CEP Local  814-M is to solve any grievance filed.”

Global News Director Ian Haysom was more forthcoming:

“We don’t see the Mike McCardell contract as any precedent … he’s very much the exception to the rule. He had reached retirement age, but we wanted to continue a relationship with him because he brings a special element to the show,”  Haysom wrote in an e-mail response to my query.

“He’s a personality, bringing his own quirky touch to the newscasts. He’s won national and regional awards for commentary. As a bestselling author and a BC institution, we think Mike is a special — and rare — case.,” he added.

Few of Mike’s fellow co-workers would argue with that … but they wonder why the company didn’t just allow him to keep working beyond 65 as a full time employee under the union contract? 

Or follow the rules and post his job when they decided to hire him back after his “retirement”?

After all, he is not just working occasionally or temporarily … but five days a week .. just as he did before,   when he was classified as a permanent employee.

Union members are wondering how many other reporters and writers might the company find down the road with “special” qualifications that the company might feel would allow them to also work outside the union agreement?

And if there were ever another strike (Global workers were out for 33 days in 1998), would these “special” writers and reporters who work outside the contract, keep working?

The fear is real, the concerns are real, the grievance is real.

Meanwhile Mike, my sources say, is still paying union dues. But from the union’s point of view, that clearly is not enough.

With a grievance now filed, it’s quite evident Mike’s union brothers and sisters are concerned that special contracts like his could ”do in” their union agreement …  and ultimately their union shop.

Harv Oberfeld

Tags: Media

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 RS // May 27, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    Nothing in fine print is ever good news.
    Andy Rooney

  • 2 brian // May 27, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    deja vu all over again…firstly, LOVE Mike’s stuff..TV of course, books, and…what he did with me on radio. In my case…I hit 65 and learnt “health coverage” plus not setting a precedent was Corus’ reason for my departure.
    It’ll be a fun one to watch.

    (Response: And “Frosty”, thousands upon thousands still miss you each morning! I’d listen each morning to see if I’d be honoured with a joke, a jibe, a kibbitz … always made my day. h.o.)

  • 3 bob // May 28, 2009 at 3:29 am

    I thought that mandatory retirement was illegal. Would not Canwest – as a federally regulated company – have to follow the Charter?

    S.15(1) “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.”

    (Response: Good point. I’m not sure why they proceeded the way the did, except for trhe precedent factor … guess that will all come out in the company/union talks or fight over the grievance. I will try to keep you posted. h.o.)

  • 4 Patrick Bell (Not the MLA) // May 28, 2009 at 3:48 am

    I too love Mike’s stuff as well as miss “Frosty” in the mornings on NW. I met Mr. McCardell at a hockey game once and he was real friendly. Anyway, retirement should not have to be mandatory, period!

    The Western world is going to have to change up those policies in the next few years to be able to keep the working talent of your generation in the show. Our economy cannot afford a mass exedous of baby boomers. We do not have the numbers coming up to fill the void in all fields.

    Here is where unions push too hard the other way and will find themselves extinct in a rotting economy if not careful.

  • 5 Gary E // May 28, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Mike’s stuff for me when I had TV was great. But the issue is a union grievance. Personally I think the word “grievance” should be changed. It has a negative feel to it. This grievance was filed to protect the membership from further problems. It is not to dis Mike. What they require in a settlement is something in writing for the present and future contracts that will not allow “hiring out” which is plain hiring “strikebreakers”
    If the union did not proceed in the manner it has, they wouldn’t be much of a union.
    I’m pretty confident that Mike will come out of this unscathed unless the company decides to cancel his contract (mainly because they might want to hire scabs.) ooops I mean strikebreakers.

  • 6 Jeff // May 29, 2009 at 3:51 am

    Mike could’ve just grieved the fact that either his company or his union – or a combination thereof – has a discrimatory policy of forced retirement. It was officially done away with last year and all companies were to comply with rights guarunteed under the charter.
    Unless Mike wanted his cake too, in other words, collecting his pension and working, earning a paycheque at the same time. There might be some pension rules they’re subverting but I cannot see the company coming out on the winning side on this one.

    (Response: That’s a personal thing so have absolutely no idea if Mike decided to apply for and collect CPP or if that anything at all to do with his going on contract … but he wouldn’t be alone: lots of people now do that after turning 60 … and as long as they take whatever specified break is required before working again, nothing illegal about it at all. h.o.)

  • 7 harry l // Jun 25, 2009 at 7:00 am

    harvey you retired and do you do make the odd storie? blog?. let the man do what he loves. give the people what they want . tv should be about talent not about the union. i believe the supreme court has ruled on force retirement . shame on the union

Leave a Comment

CAPTCHA Code is needed.

If you do not enter the CAPTCHA code then your comment will be deleted when you select Submit.

*