Keeping it Real…

Keeping it Real… header image 2

No Public Ransom to Private TV

May 22nd, 2009 · 10 Comments

The big push by private television networks is on to get YOU to pay them for their “free” programming.

No, they haven’t asked for a direct tax to be paid by television viewers … but a hidden tax to be applied through the cable operators. Because I have no doubt that if forced by the CRTC to pay private television networks a fee, the cable companies will add it to our cable bill.

It is true many of the huge corporations that own our private television networks are in deep financial trouble … but everything I’ve seen and read convinces me their troubles do NOT stem from their local television operations.

Local news and local stations make money: in some cases millions upon millions of dollars in profit. And the amount of local programming hours they provide overall is piddly, compared to the massive amount of network hours and U.S. programming that they just deliver … and then sit back and let the advertising dollars roll in.

What is strangling the private networks, I believe,  is their corporate owners’ past greed and over-expansion into other ventures, acquisitions, including even some overseas, and in areas  that have almost NOTHING to do with their television services.

And with the global economic collapse,  their greed and excessive expansions and acquisitions  has caught them with their debt up but their revenues down.

But of course, no one would be very sympathetic to billion-dollar private corporations asking for a public tax to compensate them for bad over-reaching past decisions. And the CRTC wouldn’t likely be very sympathetic to an appeal to bail them out of  these dumb decisions.

So the corporate parents took their own local television children hostage: give us your money or will kill the babies (small market television stations,and even their grown up siblings of news and programming in major markets ).

And to soften up any resistance, they have already lopped off a few digits to send a message to the public and regulators: pay up or there will be more.

Private networks are even running ads urging viewers to help save the baby … even hinting DEATH could lie ahead if we fail to speak out loudly enough for the ransom to be paid (although that’s not how they depict it or  call it! )

And the CRTC, terrified at the prospect of being seen as complicit in the murder of  local services, seems about to cave in and pay the ransom: or at least, have YOU pay the ransom.

BUT all the propaganda … sorry, advertising ..  I’ve seen being used to justify handing over hundreds of millions of dollars of public money to the private billion-dollar corporations leaves out what I see as a very critical point.

“Cable and satelite companies have been charging you for delivering our signal for years, without paying local stations a penny in return” opines a CTV ad now running to stir up public support.

And how’s this for a scare tactic: the ads urges viewers to support their campaign “before local television is silenced forever”.  Total hysteria.  Give us a break!!!

If the big conglomerates don’t want their licences in smaller or medium-sized markets, let them go. As the economy revives, I have NO doubt that other no-sniveling corporations or even groups of local business people will come forward and scoop up those licences in those communities ..and maybe even expand local content/coverage in the process.

Meanwhile I expect similar scare-tactic ads will be run on private networks right across Canada in an attempt to coerce the CRTC into paying up.

But wait!  What’s missing from those ads?  How about a mention of the hundreds of millions of dollars CTV (and the other private networks) take in as advertising revenue … billions of dollars over the last 10 years … from the huge audiences delivered to them THANKS to the cable companies carrying their signal …  from what I understand, without the networks paying the cable operators a single penny either. :)

Imagine what would happen to ANY of the private networks if a local cable operators refused to carry their signal. Aaaaargh! Swift death would soon follow … for the network, not the cable operator!!

But of course, the CRTC would not allow that: it REQUIRES cable operators to carry Canada’s major private networks, and the networks cash in as a result of that.   Isn’t that enough?

Until now, the two have had a very profitable, symbiotic relationship: cable makes millions by running the signal; and the networks make millions on the advertising they broadcast, thanks to cable.

Local television across Canada has ALREADY paid a heavy price for the foolishness of network executives and their corporate acquisitions and expansions. 

News programs have been slashed, local shows cancelled, sports content trimmed or eliminated  … and I suspect even if the CRTC caves and gives in to the ransom demands, more cuts will come to news, sports etc. especially after the 2010 Olympics … UNLESS the CRTC stands up for local Canadian television.

Let the private corporations who own the TV networks dig themselves out of their own stupidity by divesting themselves of their losing non-television assets (or liabilities). Or refinance and restructure like so many other private corporations do … without demanding public bucks.

(The auto industry is, of course, an exception, but even they are theoretically only getting loans … stop laughing … that will be paid back as the economy recovers.. and NONE of them are having a special public fee added on to our bills just to bail them out.)

If you care at all about this, and want to stop the ransom from being paid and rules enforced to protect exisiting local television and news levels, I urge you to write the CRTC, Ottawa, Ont. K1A ON2 …   and get everyone you know to write as well.

Because I’ll bet the private networks are getting all their staffs, suppliers, office cleaners, business associates, board of trade friends, politicians, and their uncles and aunts to write the CRTC appealing for the ransom to be paid.

The majority MUST also speak out to ensure the CRTC doesn’t let those holding the local television stations, programs and news shows hostage kill them off … unless, of course, they do it as part of a prime time reality show.

Just  think of the ratings and advertising revenues that could bring!

Harv Oberfeld

Tags: Media

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 D.M. Johnston // May 22, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    If they do that I believe I will cancel cable altogether and go back to an antenna.

    (Response: Then they’ll all go digital .. making local antennas useless. Hope enough people write the CRTC to stop the ransom from being paid. h.o.)

  • 2 brian // May 22, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    Harve: Does this mean you won’t be going down to CTV this weekend to have your picture taken with Mi Jung Lee at the anchor desk? Apparently, it’s free…good chance too to visit their gift shop to get a Tamara Taggert lunch kit.

    (Response: I wonder if during their Open House they’ll be getting people to sign petitions or letters pleading for the ransom to be paid? h.o.)

  • 3 Dave W // May 22, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    Perhaps you could go without TV. It’s not easy, but amazingly enough life goes on.

    (Response: Never. I am a TV junkie … from the Mulroney hearings to Big Brother. Have to admit I’d pay the hgiher bill ..but not happily, knowing I’d be paying from my pension to clear up mistakes made by millionaire CEOs/owners. h.o.)

  • 4 Patrick Bell (Not the MLA) // May 22, 2009 at 11:55 pm

    I’m an internet Junky. I barely watch TV and in fact only have the basic cable as we speak. If they go ahead with this, I’ll kill my cable altogether.

  • 5 Robert // May 23, 2009 at 7:30 am

    We already pay enough for cable. We were promised competition but where is it.Th e reason my american brother in law in rural Idaho pays ways less than us is competition. Its like gas which the barrel price doesn’t go up but gas prices just jumped 7 cents.

  • 6 Skinny Dipper // May 23, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    I can guess that when CFTO-TV in Toronto gives its public tours, it will not show them the Master Control room where most of the Ontario CTV stations operate. Sudbury local television from Toronto does not seem like a good sell.

    (Response: I wonder if CFTO still has in its lobby a model of the strikebreaker/scab bus, with its meshed over blacked out windows, that was placed there during Doug Basset’s reign after a nasty strike, in which it seemed to me the union basically caved. h.o.)

  • 7 bob // May 23, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    Very brave to put your pension on the line H.O. – I salute you.

    (Response: What! My pension at risk! I TAKE EVERYTHING BACK!! LOL!! Actually I have a very good lawyer. What a story that would make too :) h.o.)

  • 8 Dave O // May 23, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    Antennas will be more valuable once everything goes digital. It is the tuner in your TV that may have to change (if you have an hdtv you are probably already ok, otherwise you’ll need a digital converter box.)

    I already watch CBC through an antenna in digital HD glory (it is about the same quality as Blu-Ray if they’re showing HD content because they use all their bandwidth. You can google it, Cable providers often downgrade HD to fit in more channels.) and unlike the old analog signals as long as I get a signal the picture is perfectly clear. I have really poor EM properties in my ground floor condo and I still get to watch with few to no interruptions.

  • 9 seth // May 31, 2009 at 1:10 am

    The CRTC is letting the cable companies pirate the signal. Remember the big mainstream media push to shut down the little guys grey market dish because they were nasty little pirates stealing their signal. Of course at the same time the cable companies were stealing American and Canadian feeds off the air. Nobody in the Mainstream media would comment of course.

    One outfit down east put the local channels on the innernet and got shutdown right pronto by the CTRC. Since then numerous applicants have tried to get CRTC permission to be like the cable pirates and put the signals on the innernet. No go.

    I doubt any CRTC member has bought his own lunch in the last 10 years with all the lobbyists lining up. Can it be the fix is in!!

  • 10 A Dave // Jun 10, 2009 at 5:27 am

    Hey HO, I just got this in my inbox from my provider, Shaw, and immediately thought of your post. It may be a dead thread, but if you return to this you may find it interesting if you didn’t get one in your own inbox — I assume all cable customers did. It ends with a link to Shaw’s page campaigning against this (I didn’t put the link on).
    Best, Dave

    “CTV, CBC and Global TV are trying to convince Canadians that local TV is in trouble. What they’re really doing is trying to push through a TV tax on all Canadians for programming you get for free today.

    They want this extra charge because they’ve misspent the hundreds of millions of dollars they’ve already received from taxpayers, cable and satellite companies. In total, cable and satellite companies pay $250 million a year in program funding to assist local broadcasters in producing Canadian television programs – as much additional funding as is provided by the Canadian government. Where does that money come from? It comes from the Canadian taxpayers.

    The major broadcasters won’t even commit to using the new money to produce new local content. That’s why the CRTC has already turned them down twice.

    None of us can afford to keep bailing out companies who don’t know how to control their spending. Help us hold the broadcasters accountable.”

    (Response: Thanks .. Glad to know they agree with my blog! ;) I have seen their messages on this ..and signed their protest form. I also sent my blog to the CRTC in Ottawa .. in the hope the private netwroks’ scare tactics and threats won’t result in the largest proposed corporate welfare bailout going through. h.o.)

Leave a Comment

CAPTCHA Code is needed.

If you do not enter the CAPTCHA code then your comment will be deleted when you select Submit.

*